I am a general contractor. First licensed in 1984. Been in the trades since
1977. I got the same overly dramatic tale of imminent collapse from our
"tour guide". I was more interested in what historical stuff they found, saved,
and general attitude about preserving history than I was about arguing about
the "near miss" they had with having a kindling pile.
The freight house was in amazingly good shape for a minimally maintained
135-year-old shed.
That said, there is a lot of arguing room between keeping an ancient, oversize
lumber shed nice and making it meet the criteria of computer-centric engineers
and code inspectors who are utterly clueless about historic building practices.
Had a can of gasoline been found in a corner of this wood structure, I am sure
some dolt could interpret that as the building nearly burned to the ground.
When I was there, the crew was "chasing demons" in the very worn and abused
monster floor planks for filling gaps to keep the Leadville winters out of a building
that had previously never had a reason to. Just the simple use change presented
the renovation team with an endless list of challenges like that, compounded by
the need/desire to keep the character of the building. The two often represent
polar opposites of outcome - preserve the history, it remains primitive and "rough
living". Make it code compliant, and it usually destroys the history.
The way they integrated the steel interior structure was certainly a novel way to
minimize the modernization appearance.
"Duty above all else except Honor"