Brake Wheel Placement

Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Brake Wheel Placement

Charles McMillan
What height should the brake wheel be placed on a boxcar above the roofline? I have not been able to find a definitive answer to this question.
Thanks for your help.
Charles M
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Brake Wheel Placement

Dave Eggleston
What period are you modeling?
Dave Eggleston
Seattle, WA
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Brake Wheel Placement

Charles McMillan
In reply to this post by Charles McMillan
I am modeling the late 1920's to early 1930's on the C&S.
Charles M
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Brake Wheel Placement

Chris Walker
Mal Ferrell's C&SNG; Ken Pruit drawing 8309 calls out 11ft 10-1/2 in, top of Rail to top of Brakewheel.

Check the FILES on the C&SN3 Blog for the Folio Drawings provided by Jim Courtney: C&S Boxcar variations in road number differing heights.
UpSideDownC
in New Zealand
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Brake Wheel Placement

Charles McMillan
Thanks for the answer Chris.
Charles M.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Brake Wheel Placement

Mike Trent
Administrator
In reply to this post by Chris Walker
Thanks, Chris, for the reminder on Jim's files in the Blog. Happy to report my cars are in range.

Ken Pruitt's drawings, like John Maxwell's and others should always be scrutinized. This has been well known among builders for a long time. Even the folios are not infallible and may include unusual aspects of particular items. An excellent example of this is the folio of the B-4-F class locomotives. which has a drawing of what can only have been #75, identifiable by the high sand dome profile, and tender. This caused some of the chaos with the On3 Sunset #74.

Another example of a Folio sheet error that really wasn't an error is the D&RGW folio of Combine #212. The drawing and specs are indeed the folio of the #212, but do not reflect that the Alamosa shop switched numbers of car #212 and #215, after sale of the #215 to the Mexican National Railway in the '40's. kits and models were made of #212 and ended up being much shorter that the #212 that everyone knew in the "Silverton" fleet.

Research always pays off, right?