Robert McFarland wrote
Could you guys please do with Hancock what you've been doing with Forks Creek?
There are a lot more photos available from Forks Creek than Hancock. The Alpine Tunnel didn't stay open very far into the era when photography was easy, and Hancock was a lot farther from any population center. These are the only photos I have:
This Collier view was probably taken in 1883. I think it's been published, but it is one of the few photos I've seen where locomotives have received Congdon stacks but have not yet been fitted with air pumps. The front loco appears to be a Brooks mogul. My guess is #30 because the second digit is visible on the sand dome and appears to be a "0" and the tender is clearly lettered for DSP&P, and #30 was the only Brooks mogul listed for the DSP&P that originally had a number ending in zero (and the photo pre-dates the 1885 renumbering). The second photo looks like a Baldwin 2-8-0, but I don't know which. The Tiffany is no. 1059, and the boxcar behind it looks to have an 8xx number.
This Clinton Scott view is probably from the 1890's. It has been published by the DSP&PHS in either The Bogies and the Loop or one of their calendars (or maybe both). I think I've also put enlargements from it on the Narrow Gauge Discussion Forum in the past. The flanger is lettered D.L.UG. and its number ends with a "3." The business car is 025, and the rear loco is #265.