Box culverts

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
40 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Box culverts

Jeff Young
I've been searching for pictures of box culverts (specifically, what the ICC maps call "wood box") without much luck.

I found this one near Jefferson:


http://digital.denverlibrary.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15330coll22/id/43040/rec/69

and this one near Denver:


http://digital.denverlibrary.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15330coll22/id/42471/rec/78

and this, which is perhaps what they term an "open box" (or it might just be a single-span trestle):


http://digital.denverlibrary.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15330coll22/id/42483/rec/102

None of these, however, are very satisfying from a modelling perspective.

Anyone have (or know of) any more?

Thanks,
Jeff.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Chris Walker
How about some brand new uninstalled box culvert sections ?


http://digital.denverlibrary.org/cdm/fullbrowser/collection/p15330coll22/id/76301/rv/singleitem/rec/5
UpSideDownC
in New Zealand
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Tim Schreiner
Here are a few images of the remains of one just west of Como.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Tim Schreiner
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Tim Schreiner
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Chris Walker
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Jeff Young
Excellent stuff, guys.

It’s reasonably clear that none of them have wings on the exit sides.

Only the Idaho Springs open culvert clearly shows the entrance side, and it doesn’t appear to have wings either.

So I’m going to surmise that box culverts are wingless.

It would appear that there are several different construction types: the smaller ones with 3 edge-jointed boards, all along the flow; the open types with a couple of “spreaders” at right angles to the flow; and larger closed ones with planked (across the flow) roofs.

Tim’s example (which appears to be at least 24” wide) could be either the “large” type or the open type.  None of the boxes between Como and Red Hill are listed on the ICC as open, and the first is 36” x 36”, so we’ll assume Tim’s example is a “large”.

Cheers,
Jeff.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Jeff Young
There's a great picture of a semi-open (?) wood box culvert on page 177 of the Pictorial Supplement.  (It's directly under rail level, with what appear to be 8" x 8" bridge ties covering the culvert, with the rails running along two of the bridge ties.)

There's also a nice picture of one under construction on page 355, but it doesn't contain any details of the wood box itself.

Sadly, that's about it in the way of wood boxes....
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Jeff Ramsey
In reply to this post by Jeff Young
A still fuctional wood box or culvert at MP 9.28 or bridge 1406 located in Bear Valley City Park in Sheridan, west of Sheridan Junction. Most likely the only intact structure on the Morrison Branch.

 
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Jeff Young
Hi Jeff,

Any idea of the dimensions on that one?  It's hard to tell the scale from just the grass and weeds, but it looks to be quite small (on the order of 12" or something)?

Thanks,
Jeff.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Darel Leedy
Administrator
In reply to this post by Jeff Young


David Primus took this photo in Dickey during the Spring of 2002. 10 years later in 2012 (another drought year) I was there but didn't take a picture or measure the culvert.
But it does show how being submerged in icy water for 40 some years is good for preservation.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Jeff Young
That’s quite remarkable (and a great picture from a modelling perspective).  

The timber is quite light.  Those look to be 1”x4”s?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Darel Leedy
Administrator
More like 2" or 3" x at least 8". Think big planks.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Jeff Young
Well, that’s good.  I really didn’t fancy trying to make anything out of HO-scale 1”x4”s. ;)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Chris Walker
Not even a Snowfence?
UpSideDownC
in New Zealand
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Jeff Young
> Not even a Snowfence?

He he… I have what I’m calling 2x6’s for that.  (They’re actually a scale 2.75" x 5.5", but close enough.)

Cheers,
Jeff.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Chris Walker
How about no less than Four in quick succession following a short span?

http://digital.denverlibrary.org/cdm/fullbrowser/collection/p15330coll21/id/9822/rv/singleitem/rec/1687
UpSideDownC
in New Zealand
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Chris Walker
This post was updated on .
In reply to this post by Jeff Young
Jeff,

your single span bridge, in close-up


http://digital.denverlibrary.org/cdm/fullbrowser/collection/p15330coll22/id/42511/rv/singleitem/rec/144
UpSideDownC
in New Zealand
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Jeff Young
> your single span bridge, in close-up

Nice one, Chris!  (Definitely a trestle bent in there, so it is indeed not an open box culvert.)

Do you have the call-number for that image?  (The link just goes to the DPL’s front door.)

Cheers,
Jeff.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Box culverts

Chris Walker
12