Re: #21 v #22
Posted by
Todd A Ferguson on
URL: http://c-sng-discussion-forum.254.s1.nabble.com/21-v-22-tp7249p9871.html
Ken, the article I am thinking about is in the July 2014 Gazette.
I looked it up in my Gazette DVD collection. Their search function sucks on that product …unfortunate. I searched 2-6 to find it…LOL
Todd
On Oct 29, 2017, at 1:51 PM, Ken Ford [via C&Sng Discussion Forum] <
[hidden email]> wrote:
Keith Hayes wrote
Also, Mal did a nice feature in one of the Narrow Gauge Annual's on his modifications to the Bachmann model.
I have always been partial to 21 for no good reason whatsoever. When PFM imported these eons ago, it seemed to me at the time that the model more closely resembled 21 than 22. I always found it odd these locos were scrapped rather early, yet according to the numbering should have had a greater tractive effort than the Cooke's, but the latter were more powerful.
Does anyone know which issue this article was in? I didn’t see anything obvious looking at the on-line contents.