Re: #21 v #22

Posted by Ken Ford on
URL: http://c-sng-discussion-forum.254.s1.nabble.com/21-v-22-tp7249p9868.html

Keith Hayes wrote

Also, Mal did a nice feature in one of the Narrow Gauge Annual's on his modifications to the Bachmann model.

I have always been partial to 21 for no good reason whatsoever. When PFM imported these eons ago, it seemed to me at the time that the model more closely resembled 21 than 22. I always found it odd these locos were scrapped rather early, yet according to the numbering should have had a greater tractive effort than the Cooke's, but the latter were more powerful.

Does anyone know which issue this article was in?  I didn’t see anything obvious looking at the on-line contents.