Re: Love me tender (With apologies to Elvis) …
Posted by Mike Trent on
URL: http://c-sng-discussion-forum.254.s1.nabble.com/Love-me-tender-With-apologies-to-Elvis-tp499p523.html
Derrell, your information from Lundberg is what I was erroniously referring to yesterday as being from HW Ridgway. I believe Ridgway was long retired by 1931.
I have not been able to find a hard copy, but I have a jpg image that does show Lundberg's note that #70's tender was now on #537. with similar calculations regarding the before and after capacities of #537's new tank.
I'll include that page here, though it's largely illegible. But interesting nonetheless. Your information is from the opposite page.
One question, what was Lundberg's measurement of the length of the original #537 tank? I believe you missed that on your notes above.
Thanks to Hol Wagner.
URL: http://c-sng-discussion-forum.254.s1.nabble.com/Love-me-tender-With-apologies-to-Elvis-tp499p523.html
Derrell, your information from Lundberg is what I was erroniously referring to yesterday as being from HW Ridgway. I believe Ridgway was long retired by 1931.
I have not been able to find a hard copy, but I have a jpg image that does show Lundberg's note that #70's tender was now on #537. with similar calculations regarding the before and after capacities of #537's new tank.
I'll include that page here, though it's largely illegible. But interesting nonetheless. Your information is from the opposite page.
One question, what was Lundberg's measurement of the length of the original #537 tank? I believe you missed that on your notes above.
Thanks to Hol Wagner.
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |