Re: Experience with Sound / DCC

Posted by pizlinard72 on Aug 20, 2024; 6:03pm
URL: http://c-sng-discussion-forum.254.s1.nabble.com/Experience-with-Sound-DCC-tp20057p20068.html

All, I have been doing some research. The two major systems are different in the following ways.

Europe (ESU, Zimo): They offer empty decoders and the possibility to upload sound files. ESU has about 30 different US steam engines available. Each sound file can be changed and adapted to one's needs. The access to functions for lights, servos, etc. is given in a preset but can be changed as desired. Programming is done via a computer and a decoder programming device.

US: Each decoder has a set of generic sounds on the decoder. It is possible to select the sounds for each engine and then program the intensity and properties via the handheld device.
JMRI is a software solution that offers many different options for how to control decoders and even the entire layout. Access and programming of decoders is done via special hardware or command stations.

Advantages of the European system: You program the decoder yourself and have all the options. There is an original sound file from No 9 when it ran on the Georgetown loop.
Disadvantages: Steep learning curve and cost of programming device

Advantages of the US system: sound is on the decoder, selection of sounds is straightforward
Disadvantages of the US system: specific sounds of a locomotive are not available.

Any comments or additions?

I tend to go for the European system as I already have the programming device for the decoder. ESU has the following sounds available:
https://projects.esu.eu/projectoverviews/18?type=steam&order=date

Maybe the sound file from the C-19 at the CRRM of 346 for C&S 72 and a mogul sound for No 8 would do well. Have a listen to what the files sound like.

Best, Christian